Simply removing or disabling:
... in the list and adding:
fixes everything. And because it is a client-side css hide and allows the js, there is no 'trigger'. Also, a webmaster would never even know there was any blocking of that .... all the stats would show full downloading of that js and any stats pertaining to the blocking of that would become worthless (a disadvantage for any webmaster). All ads would be hidden client-side ... an area where the webmaster would have no control. And if that tries to get defeated somehow I also have a "plan B". Do we really want to go "round & round" here?
The first is a simple solution that is very effective. But at this point, I am not going to bother with doing that. Let him do what he feels he needs to do ... I will not interfere. I want to go outside and then watch the nascar race this afternoon. I don't need to get tied up in some kind of an adblocking "p*ssing contest".
If you want to try to keep getting around these, Danny, you will NEVER get any other work done. Let me repeat this, I will do NOTHING about any of this right now. I will leave things alone as they are for the time being. I just posted this to show you that the blocking can easily be defeated if need be.
I'm am very sorry about the things that have happened in your life and I really wish you would just ask your viewers simply to whitelist your site(s) ... that is the way most site owners do it, and many have great success with it. Regular readers WANT to help support a site. You would be amazed! So just try asking them to whitelist.
You can catch more flies with honey ....
I really have nothing personal against you, but you must understand that we cannot simply go around allowing ads on sites simply because owners asked us to, THAT would be hypocrisy! We also cannot allow the slander of our name and the name-calling of us and our users . Calling us and our users names and going off on some 'nutsy', name-calling rampage is NOT the right way to gain favor with us or our users. And I will do what I have to do to protect our product's name and our users rights.
I also find your blocking page MUCH more acceptable in its wording, Danny, even though it it seems to somehow violate the 'spirit' of what I wanted you to do ... and that was to keep telling everyone that they were 'thieves'. But oh well.