Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Inclusion proposals for "acceptable ads" list are discussed here. New topics cannot be created, constructive comments are welcome, flaming will be removed.

Moderators: Till, greiner

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby ManuelC » Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:03 pm

Lain_13 wrote:Proposition to add content restrictions on acceptable ads. In particular I'd like to strictly forbid any disturbing pictures like depiction of various unhealthy skin conditions or naked/half-naked men and women (especially old).
For example, we currently have Criteo.net in the whitelist and that's how their 'acceptable' ads looks like:
http://imgur.com/a/tIC64
Two pictures on the left are fine, but half naked old guy and that tumor on the right are clearly not.
Here is another unpleasant sample:
http://imgur.com/a/BW9Q2



Hi Lain_13,

I have serious doubts that those are Criteo ads. Can you please provide steps to reproduce them, like urls and your browser settings?

Thanks!
ManuelC
 

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby lewisje » Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:46 am

Umbral wrote:Adblock Plus’s Acceptable Ads Committee.

Latest Ad block plus is no longer blocking anything properly.

I don't watch porn but to test your Ad block Plus here you go :

https://www.xvideos.com/video28429565/b ... il_taissia

Huge Penis enlargement pictures on the right.

And here ads on the right top side :

http://farmergrup.ucoz.com/

These were previously blocked.
Those surely weren't allowed by the Acceptable Ads whitelist; go to lanik.us (EasyList forums) to complain about content that should be blocked but isn't.
There's a buzzin' in my brain I really can't explain; I think about it before they make me go to bed.
lewisje
 
Posts: 2743
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:07 pm

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby Danbeee » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:04 pm

The other you mention seem to have more to do with Google's privacy policy than with Adblock Plus.

Post edited by forum moderator: domain removed due to ABP policy violation.
Danbeee
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:00 pm

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby panel123 » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:01 pm

The program defines criteria for the content, size and positioning of ads on a web page that are deemed to be acceptable for display even when the AdBlock Plus ad blocker is enabled. Once the ads on a website have been submitted and approved by the program, those ads will appear to visitors using AdBlock Plus. The displaying of acceptable ads, however, is only supported by AdBlock Plus, and may be turned off by users that do not wish to see any advertising.
panel123
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:11 pm

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby Morkus78 » Tue May 08, 2018 6:16 am

That's a good step.
Morkus78
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 6:11 am

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby Tropilac » Tue May 22, 2018 2:59 pm

YouTube advertising should be allowed if the ad runs for less than 10 seconds.

YouTubers rely heavily on ad revenue and a 10 second ad is a small price to pay for the content some content creators post.
Tropilac
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 2:56 pm

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Postby sovak_jack » Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:00 pm

Do you think this is acceptable?

https://imgur.com/a/71VevP5
sovak_jack
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:55 pm

Previous

Return to Acceptable ads proposals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests