Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Inclusion proposals for "acceptable ads" list are discussed here. New topics cannot be created, constructive comments are welcome, flaming will be removed.

Moderators: greiner, ionyshchenko, Till, r.grygorczuk, ptraykova, Helle, j.mathai

حفاظ شاخ گوزنی
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:26 am
Contact:

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Post by حفاظ شاخ گوزنی »

i think that was useful
and Non-search ads are not part of it
alexiasarconi
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Post by alexiasarconi »

Un-obtrusive ads are fine, if the user experience is not being affected and the links look well placed inside text whether it be an affiliate link or not should be no problem.

Im going to say adopt the change. :)
sofigi
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2021 12:57 am
Contact:

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Post by sofigi »

if the user experience is not affected and the links are well placed within the text everything is fine 8)
anteletica1989
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2024 10:27 am

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

Post by anteletica1989 »

Hi there,

We have noticed that
tracking.s24.com^$popup,third-party
media*.s24.com^$third-party
widgets.s24.com

are on the adblock list. Shopping24 is a price comparison website that also provides big publishers in Germany like Web.de to host those widgets on their website. The site/ads are not pop up and in no way intrusive display ads. The above domains are used for hosting the widgets as well as tracking.

Would you be so kind to have a look and remove us from the list.

Thank you very much!
Post Reply