Page 5 of 5

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:03 pm
by ManuelC
Lain_13 wrote:Proposition to add content restrictions on acceptable ads. In particular I'd like to strictly forbid any disturbing pictures like depiction of various unhealthy skin conditions or naked/half-naked men and women (especially old).
For example, we currently have Criteo.net in the whitelist and that's how their 'acceptable' ads looks like:
http://imgur.com/a/tIC64
Two pictures on the left are fine, but half naked old guy and that tumor on the right are clearly not.
Here is another unpleasant sample:
http://imgur.com/a/BW9Q2



Hi Lain_13,

I have serious doubts that those are Criteo ads. Can you please provide steps to reproduce them, like urls and your browser settings?

Thanks!

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:46 am
by lewisje
Umbral wrote:Adblock Plus’s Acceptable Ads Committee.

Latest Ad block plus is no longer blocking anything properly.

I don't watch porn but to test your Ad block Plus here you go :

https://www.xvideos.com/video28429565/b ... il_taissia

Huge Penis enlargement pictures on the right.

And here ads on the right top side :

http://farmergrup.ucoz.com/

These were previously blocked.
Those surely weren't allowed by the Acceptable Ads whitelist; go to lanik.us (EasyList forums) to complain about content that should be blocked but isn't.

Re: Proposal to improve Acceptable Ads criteria

PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:04 pm
by Danbeee
The other you mention seem to have more to do with Google's privacy policy than with Adblock Plus.

Post edited by forum moderator: domain removed due to ABP policy violation.