Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:16 pm
by Ares2
Wladimir Palant wrote: [*] Separate user-defined filters from subscriptions - not sure
I think Rick mentioned this before somewhere: What about just changing the name to 'My advertisement filters' or 'User created advertisement filters'. This wouldn't be hard to change but already separates them from the subscriptions to a certain extent.

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:19 pm
by Wladimir Palant
That's http://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1207

Yes, changing terminology is definitely on the plan.

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:20 pm
by SlimShady
Wladimir Palant wrote:
  • Indicate that some filters in a subscription are disabled - efficient implementation is problematic
I was thinking: you could put the disabled filters together at the top of the list/subscription.
Below you would have all the other enabled filters of the subscription.
And sort them seperately like folders and files in Windows Explorer.

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:38 pm
by Wladimir Palant
SlimShady, sort by the "Enabled" column and you will get exactly that behavior.

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:21 pm
by Wladimir Palant
Wladimir Palant wrote:"Select all"/"deselect all" for types in filter composer - need a way to add these without wasting too much space
I would really like to have this feature. However, I see only one remaining feature on my list that requires string changes - meaning that string freeze is approaching very fast. Most likely, I'll give a build to translators Sunday evening. If nobody comes up with a good way to show these buttons in the filter composer this feature won't make the next release.

To start a discussion, some options:
  • "All" and "None" links to the right of "Apply to types" - will work fine in English but the translations will almost certainly be longer, this will waste horizontal space
  • Same but below "Apply to types", with a little indentation - better space usage but probably not very obvious
  • Checkbox that selects everything when checked and unselects everything when unchecked (what would be the label?) - would need a third state for partial selection but XUL doesn't have tri-state checkboxes
  • Buttons "Select all" and "Select none" - would need to be displayed on one row, waste of horizontal space again (especially when translated)

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:25 am
by Hubird
I thought about a "Invert Selection" tick box but I'm not sure how this would work.

All in all I think it is ok to sacrifice a little horizontal real estate for added functionality. Especially since resolutions are on the increase and monitors are getting bigger and wider.

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:36 am
by Adblock Plus Fan
Hubird wrote:I thought about a "Invert Selection" tick box but I'm not sure how this would work.
How about an "Invert All" button? That's a little bit less confusing than tickbox, and a little smaller.

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:28 am
by smk
maybe do it a bit like in e-mails?
like select some things (includes select all, select none, etc.), then an action: invert, enable, disable, etc.
With this, invert all would become: select all -> invert
Just my opinion

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:57 pm
by Hubird
Is Select all"/"deselect all" for types in filter composer going to make it into ABP 1.0 ?

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:12 pm
by Wladimir Palant
@Hubird: No, too late for that, string freeze was weeks ago.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:30 am
by Wladimir Palant
Select all/select none has been implemented a while ago. Let's mark this one as done now, I doubt that the remaining two points will be implemented.