Page 3 of 3
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:33 pm
by Wladimir Palant
Of course not. If something is blocked then there will be no connection to the server hosting it. Without a connection - no headers. As I said much further up, this feature is there to complement the current EasyPrivacy functionality, not to replace it.
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:59 pm
by Weirdo
shouldnt it be DNT instead of donottrack?
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:03 pm
by Wladimir Palant
It is already - changed a while ago.
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:47 am
by Weirdo
oh sorry about that-
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:24 am
by Hubird
So
Is no longer the correct filter ?
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:51 am
by Michael
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:26 am
by Hubird
Thanks for the clarification.
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:52 pm
by Weirdo
Wait if it was changed i thought it would be *$image,~image,dnt
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:57 pm
by MonztA
As Michael said the filter syntax has not changed, but the header that is sent to websites.
Re: [Done] Supporting X-Do-Not-Track header
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 4:59 pm
by Wladimir Palant