[Added] filedir.com ads

Inclusion proposals for "acceptable ads" list are discussed here. New topics cannot be created, constructive comments are welcome, flaming will be removed.

Moderators: greiner, ionyshchenko, Till, r.grygorczuk, ptraykova, Helle, j.mathai

Post Reply
ManuelC

[Added] filedir.com ads

Post by ManuelC »

Proposed filters:

Code: Select all

@@||pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/$script,domain=filedir.com
@@||g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?$subdocument,domain=filedir.com
filedir.com#@#iframe[id^="google_ads_frame"]
filedir.com#@#.adsbygoogle
filedir.com#@#.abox300
Link to a test page:
https://filedir.com/android/communicati ... 62782.html
https://filedir.com/android/communicati ... 62782.html

Advertising type:
Google AdSense text ad units on: 1. Right sidebar on info pages. 2. Top of the content on download pages.

Additional Technical Information:
None

Concerns:
None
shabie
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:59 pm

Re: [added] filedir.com ads

Post by shabie »

Whitelisted Ads as of March 2015.

Advertising type:
Google AdSense text ad units on:

1. Right sidebar on info pages.
Image

2. Top of the content on download pages.
Image
shabie
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:59 pm

Re: [Under review] filedir.com ads

Post by shabie »

Under review due to criteria violation (label is missing). Recent changes made by Google in their content text ads made their label disappear. Those ads should be clearly recognizable as such, so a proper label will be requested.
ManuelC

Re: [Under review] filedir.com ads

Post by ManuelC »

shabie wrote:Under review due to criteria violation (label is missing). Recent changes made by Google in their content text ads made their label disappear. Those ads should be clearly recognizable as such, so a proper label will be requested.
Proper label added again.
appagg
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 1:52 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by appagg »

We are moved. Please update our domain name from "filedir.com" to "appagg.com"

Thanks!
appagg
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 1:52 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by appagg »

We are moved. Please update our domain name from "filedir.com" to "appagg.com"

Thanks!
mbollien
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:30 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by mbollien »

Hi appagg team,

Many apologies that we didn't reply to your first post on this topic. I'll take care of getting the new filters for your website added accordingly.

Next time and to avoid any delay (as it happened here), please use our contact form or any e-mail address you know already. In your example, it would have been Manuel.

I'll write you an e-mail once the filters were added for you.

Best regards,
Marcus
mbollien
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:30 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by mbollien »

appagg
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 21, 2017 1:52 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by appagg »

mbollien wrote:Added new filters for appagg.com: https://hg.adblockplus.org/exceptionrul ... be842ffac1
filedir.com still here (https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus. ... nrules.txt), not appagg.
mbollien
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:30 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by mbollien »

philippap34
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:05 am

Re: [Under review] filedir.com ads

Post by philippap34 »

shabie wrote:Under review due to criteria violation (label is missing). Recent changes made by Google in their content text ads made their label disappear. Those ads should be clearly recognizable as such, so a proper label will be requested.
If it's an official announcement, there should always be labels I guess.
mbollien
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:30 pm

Re: [Added] filedir.com ads

Post by mbollien »

philippap34 wrote:
shabie wrote:Under review due to criteria violation (label is missing). Recent changes made by Google in their content text ads made their label disappear. Those ads should be clearly recognizable as such, so a proper label will be requested.
If it's an official announcement, there should always be labels I guess.
Hi philippap34,

Thanks for bringing this up. I just did a doublecheck and recognized all ads are clearly labeled and so compliant with the Acceptable Ads criteria. If you're seeing anything different, please let us know.

Best regards,
Marcus
Post Reply