I mainly thought about this text on the page Known adblock plus subscriptions
en/subscriptions
Can't see your filter list here? Send the information you would like to be displayed here. Please note that in order to be included in this list your subscription must contain a comment at the beginning describing the origin of the filter list and the preferred way of contacting you if problems with your list occur. You should also be certain that when these issues arise you will be able to fix them in a reasonable amount of time.
And this policy
https://easylist.adblockplus.org/en/policy as the list is a supplement to easylist
EasyList policy
Purpose
EasyList filters must remove adverts, although it is acceptable for them to incidentally remove tracking.
Self-promotion should not be specifically removed by EasyList, although equally should not be whitelisted if it is blocked.
Adverts must be blocked regardless of the reasons for their presence or the purpose that the money raised ultimately serves.
Filter evaluation
Evidence should be provided that filters need to be added to the subscription.
Specific filters should only added if a substantial amount of advertising is removed by its inclusion.
Consistently problematic filters should be removed from the subscription.
Anti-Adblock should only be challenged if the system limits website functionality or causes significant disruption to browsing.
Coverage
Filters should only be added for English websites; supplements support other languages.
If it is not feasible for a supplement to override EasyList filters should be added to the primary subscription.
Languages for which there are no supplements may have issues resolved in EasyList; however, these filters should ideally be transferred to another subscription.
Syntax
Domains specifically serving adverts should be blocked on all third-party websites.
Filters must be as efficient as possible.
Only element rules based on id or class should be applied to all domains, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
Whitelists should be specific enough to avoid protecting unwanted items.
EasyPrivacy policy
Purpose
EasyPrivacy filters must remove tracking.
Filter evaluation
Evidence should be provided that filters need to be added to the subscription.
Filters for first-party trackers should only be added if the items blocked collect a significant amount of personal data.
Consistently problematic filters should be removed from the subscription.
Coverage
Filters should be added for websites of all languages.
Syntax
Domains specifically serving tracking should be blocked on all third-party websites.
Filters must be as efficient as possible.
Whitelists should be specific enough to avoid protecting unwanted items.
Still, reports made by the built-in reporting tool are getting ignored (I have notified the author on the forums but still nothing). There's also unoptimized and false rules slipping on the list continuously breaking stuff/blocking stuff that shouldnt be blocked, seems like the author doesnt quality check the rules that are proposed to be added to the list on the forums. One example of purposefully adding rules not in the scope of the policy are rules to remove facebook "like" buttons from websites.
I will further notify the author on the list's forums and I will quote your response if this would make a difference, if you would contact the author about these problems and link to the author guidelines when they are ready would probably help as well. If not, a propose notion should probably be added that explains that the list is quite, if not very, problematic or the list completely removed from the official list of known rules.
It's otherwise a great list that is recommended to be used but these problems recently are quite severe and if they arent getting fixed, I will need to change my opinion to not recommending people to use the list.