Inclusion proposals for "acceptable ads" list are discussed here. New topics cannot be created , constructive comments are welcome, flaming will be removed.
Moderators: greiner , ionyshchenko , Till , r.grygorczuk , ptraykova , Helle , j.mathai
greiner
ABP Developer
Posts: 899 Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:29 pmLocation: Cologne, Germany
Post
by greiner Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:47 pm
Proposed filters:
Code: Select all
@@||linksynergy.com^$image,domain=lagspike.tvLink to a test page:
http://www.lagspike.tv/channels/
Advertising type:
Static image ads on the top- and bottom-right.
Additional Technical Information:
None
Concerns:
Both are large images (300x250), and can be regarded as attention-grabbing.
screwadp
Posts: 1 Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:25 pm
Post
by screwadp Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:29 pm
Really? You are now going to whitelist banners? This is very dissapointing to me. You are definitely selling out. What happened to the times when you did what you should do: BLOCK ADS? I am out.
BunnyF0cker666
Posts: 1 Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:48 am
Post
by BunnyF0cker666 Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:50 am
Of course you start showing banners. *fetches pitchfork and torch*
mapx
Posts: 21940 Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:01 pm
Post
by mapx Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:14 am
BunnyF0cker666 wrote: Of course you start showing banners. *fetches pitchfork and torch*
only if you accept non intrusive ads ==> your free choice
greiner
ABP Developer
Posts: 899 Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:29 pmLocation: Cologne, Germany
Post
by greiner Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:02 pm
Rejected.
shabie
Posts: 771 Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:59 pm
Post
by shabie Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:41 pm
Removed since the website owner didn't fulfill the terms and conditions of the whitelisting agreement.
